Staff Reporter
WINDHOEK, November 9 — Namibia’s Twyfelfontein Conservancy boasts centuries-old cave paintings that tell a unique story of harmonious coexistence between humans and wildlife. Recognized as a UNESCO World Heritage Site, these ancient artworks challenge the prevailing narrative perpetuated by animal rights groups that international hunting poses a threat to wildlife populations.
The cave paintings, dating back 4,000 years, depict the Bushmen or Damara communities engaging in daily hunting practices for sustenance. Despite this historical interaction, the wildlife populations in the area thrived, suggesting that traditional hunting methods, which included ethical guidelines like avoiding hunting pregnant animals, were sustainable and did not jeopardize wildlife.
International Hunting as a Conservation Tool
The introduction of international hunting to Namibia in 1998, under the guidance of former President Sam Nujoma, reinforced the country’s commitment to sustainable wildlife management. Stringent regulations, such as a 0.5% quota for hunted wildlife, were implemented to ensure that hunting did not deplete populations.
International hunting has proven to be a boon for Namibian communities, offering incentives to combat poaching and supporting local development in infrastructure, education, and healthcare. The revenue generated from regulated hunting has transformed former poachers into advocates for wildlife conservation, highlighting the positive impact of well-managed hunting practices on wildlife populations.
Contrasting Outcomes: Kenya’s Wildlife Decline
In stark contrast, Kenya’s decision to impose an international hunting ban in 1977 has resulted in a catastrophic decline in wildlife populations. Experts attribute this decline to the loss of incentives for communities to coexist with wildlife, leading to increased poaching and habitat loss.
Climate Change: A Real Threat to Wildlife
While animal rights groups focus on international hunting as a perceived threat to wildlife, they often overlook the more significant impact of man-made climate change. Severe droughts, fueled by climate change, are causing widespread food and water shortages for African wildlife, resulting in unnecessary suffering and death.
A Call for Focused Action: Prioritize Climate Change Mitigation
If animal rights groups genuinely care about wildlife welfare, their efforts would be better directed towards addressing the real and urgent threat posed by climate change. Advocating for an international ban on the oil trade, a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions and subsequent climate change would be a meaningful step in protecting wildlife populations from the devastating effects of climate-related challenges.
Conclusion: A Balanced Approach for Conservation
Namibia’s ancient cave paintings and the success of international hunting in the country provide compelling evidence that regulated hunting can coexist with thriving wildlife populations. To truly safeguard the welfare of wildlife, it is essential to recognize and prioritize the more significant threat posed by climate change while promoting sustainable practices that benefit both wildlife and local communities.
